prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Is sonographic assessment of cervical length better than digital examination in screening for preterm delivery in a low-risk population?
  Preuzmi
PDF 101.7 KB
Znanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Is sonographic assessment of cervical length better than digital examination in screening for preterm delivery in a low-risk population?
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 85 (2006), 11; 1342-1347. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340600935722
Matijević, Ratko; Grgić, Ozren; Vasilj, Oliver

Institucijski repozitorij: Dr Med - digitalni repozitorij Medicinskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu

Citirajte ovaj rad

Matijević, R., Grgić, O. i Vasilj, O. (2006). Is sonographic assessment of cervical length better than digital examination in screening for preterm delivery in a low-risk population?. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 85. (11), 1342-1347. doi: 10.1080/00016340600935722

Matijević, Ratko, et al. "Is sonographic assessment of cervical length better than digital examination in screening for preterm delivery in a low-risk population?." Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 85, br. 11, 2006, str. 1342-1347. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340600935722

Matijević, Ratko, Ozren Grgić i Oliver Vasilj. "Is sonographic assessment of cervical length better than digital examination in screening for preterm delivery in a low-risk population?." Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 85, br. 11 (2006): 1342-1347. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340600935722

Matijević, R., Grgić, O. i Vasilj, O. (2006) 'Is sonographic assessment of cervical length better than digital examination in screening for preterm delivery in a low-risk population?', Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 85(11), str. 1342-1347. doi: 10.1080/00016340600935722

Matijević R, Grgić O, Vasilj O. Is sonographic assessment of cervical length better than digital examination in screening for preterm delivery in a low-risk population?. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica [Internet]. 2006. [pristupljeno 09.11.2024.];85(11):1342-1347. doi: 10.1080/00016340600935722

R. Matijević, O. Grgić i O. Vasilj, "Is sonographic assessment of cervical length better than digital examination in screening for preterm delivery in a low-risk population?", Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 85, br. 11, str. 1342-1347, 2006. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:262128. [Citirano: 09.11.2024.]

Za citiranje koristite ovu mrežnu adresu: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:262128
Podaci o radu
Naslov (engleski)Is sonographic assessment of cervical length better than digital examination in screening for preterm delivery in a low-risk population?
AutorRatko Matijević
AutorOzren Grgić
AutorOliver Vasilj
Autorova ustanovaSveučilište u Zagrebu
Medicinski fakultet
Znanstveno / umjetničko
područje, polje i grana		BIOMEDICINA I ZDRAVSTVO
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
Sažetak (engleski)
BACKGROUND: This randomized controlled trial compared the diagnostic accuracy of the sonographic assessment of cervical length and clinical digital examination of the cervix in the second trimester regarding the prediction of preterm delivery in a low-risk population. ----- METHODS: In total, 282 unselected, asymptomatic women with singleton pregnancy randomly underwent sonographic cervical length measurement (study group, n=138) or clinical digital examination (control group, n=144) in the second trimester. In the study group cervical length <or=5th percentile (<or=24 mm) for our population was defined as shortened. In the control group, Bishop score >or=95th percentile (>or=4) for our population was defined as high. The primary outcome measure was the diagnostic accuracy of both tests regarding the prediction of preterm delivery (<37 weeks). Results: Shortened cervical length was found in 6/138 (4.3%) women whereas the high Bishop score was found in 17/144 (11.8%) (p=0.038, Fisher's exact test). The incidence of preterm delivery was 5.7% (16/282). Regarding the prediction of preterm delivery, shortened cervical length and high Bishop score had sensitivity 57.1% versus 33.3% and positive predictive value 66.7% versus 17.6%. Shortened cervical length in comparison with high Bishop score had 12-fold higher positive likelihood ratio for preterm delivery in a low-risk population (37.4; 95%CI [8.2-170.7] versus 3.2; 95%CI [1.1-9.2]). ----- CONCLUSION: Sonographic assessment of cervical length has better diagnostic accuracy in the prediction of preterm delivery compared to digital examination in a low-risk population.
Ključne riječi (engleski)
Jezikengleski
Vrsta publikacijeZnanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Status objaveObjavljen
Vrsta recenzijeRecenziran
Verzija publikacijeZavršna verzija rukopisa prihvaćena za objavljivanje (postprint)
Naslov časopisaActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Brojčani podacivol. 85, br. 11, str. 1342-1347
p-ISSN0001-6349
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00016340600935722
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:105:262128
Datum objave publikacije2006
URL dokumentahttps://doi.org/10.1080/00016340600935722
Vrsta resursaTekst
Prava pristupaOtvoreni pristup
Uvjeti korištenjaIkona licence Zaštićeno autorskim pravom.
Datum i vrijeme pohrane2024-03-28 11:22:31