The aim of this research was to determine whether parents who reach an agreement in relation to those who do not reach an agreement in the process of mandatory counseling or family mediation differ in characteristics related to characteristics related to neuroticism, causal attributions, coparenting and attitudes about strategies for disrupting relationships of a child with another parent. Survey was conducted on 232 respondents, half of whom were women and half were men. Data were collected in several Centers for Social Welfare on a convenient sample of parents in the divorce procedure who are required to attend the mandatory counseling procedure and if they do not reach an agreement in that procedure they need to attend family mediation afterward. The study was conducted using four measurement instruments, Big Five Inventory-10 (BFI-10) for neuroticism, Relationship Attribution Measure (RAM) for measuring causal attributions, Coparenting Relationship Scale (CRS) for measuring parenthood, and Questionnaire of attitudes on strategies for disrupting the child's relationship with the other parent (USSNOD). The results showed the effect of causal attributions and parenthood on divorce conflict, i.e., failure to reach an agreement. On the constructed Questionnaire of Attitudes on Strategies for Disrupting the Child's Relationship with the Other Parent (USSNOD), which shows good measuring characteristics, no differences between parents were obtained at this stage of the divorce, which could indicate that parents who did not reach an agreement have more positive attitudes about strategies for disrupting the child's relationship with the other parent than those who reached an agreement