The thesis addresses the topic of the specificities of administrative disputes in public procurement procedures. Administrative disputes allow parties to protect their rights in proceedings before public authorities, where courts review the legality of individual decisions made by the public administration. This is particularly important in public procurement, where transparency and efficiency directly impact public interests and the expenditure of public funds. Administrative disputes in public procurement, although based on the Administrative Disputes Act, have specific features that distinguish them from general administrative disputes. Public procurement is a key area with a significant influence on the public sector, requiring efficient and fair procedures. The Public Procurement Act, as a special law, regulates these procedures, while the Administrative Disputes Act provides the general legal framework. The thesis focuses on the specificities of administrative disputes in public procurement, comparing them with general administrative disputes. The first part analyzes the history of judicial control in Croatia, the legal provisions related to public procurement, and the role of the State Commission for Supervision of Public Procurement Procedures. It then thoroughly examines the specificities of administrative disputes in public procurement, including jurisdiction, procedural requirements, and the rights of the parties. The aim of the thesis is to provide a comprehensive overview of the legal framework and to analyze the key differences between administrative disputes in public procurement and general administrative disputes.