prikaz prve stranice dokumenta EU Competition Law in the Digital Era: What to Tell About Intel?
  Preuzmi
PDF 347.09 KB
Znanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
EU Competition Law in the Digital Era: What to Tell About Intel?
U: EU Law in Context – Adjustment to Membership and Challenges of the Enlargement / EU and comparative law issues and challenges series (ECLIC). Osijek: Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2018. str. 31-62. https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/7098
Butorac Malnar, Vlatka; Kunda, Ivana

Institucijski repozitorij: Repozitorij PravRi

Citirajte ovaj rad

Butorac Malnar, V. i Kunda, I. (2018). EU Competition Law in the Digital Era: What to Tell About Intel?. EU Law in Context – Adjustment to Membership and Challenges of the Enlargement / EU and comparative law issues and challenges series (ECLIC) (str. 31-62). Osijek: Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek. doi: 10.25234/eclic/7098

Butorac Malnar, Vlatka i Ivana Kunda. "EU Competition Law in the Digital Era: What to Tell About Intel?." EU Law in Context – Adjustment to Membership and Challenges of the Enlargement / EU and comparative law issues and challenges series (ECLIC), Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2018, str. 31-62. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:118:246651

Butorac Malnar, Vlatka i Ivana Kunda. "EU Competition Law in the Digital Era: What to Tell About Intel?." U EU Law in Context – Adjustment to Membership and Challenges of the Enlargement / EU and comparative law issues and challenges series (ECLIC), 31-62. Osijek: Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2018. Citirano 02.01.2025.. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:118:246651

Butorac Malnar, V. i Kunda, I. (2018) 'EU Competition Law in the Digital Era: What to Tell About Intel?', EU Law in Context – Adjustment to Membership and Challenges of the Enlargement / EU and comparative law issues and challenges series (ECLIC), Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, str. 31-62. Preuzeto s: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:118:246651 (Datum pristupa: 02.01.2025.)

Butorac Malnar V, Kunda I. EU Competition Law in the Digital Era: What to Tell About Intel?. EU Law in Context – Adjustment to Membership and Challenges of the Enlargement / EU and comparative law issues and challenges series (ECLIC). Osijek: Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek; 2018. Str. 31-62. [pristupljeno 02.01.2025.] Dostupno na: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:118:246651

V. Butorac Malnar i I. Kunda, "EU Competition Law in the Digital Era: What to Tell About Intel?", EU Law in Context – Adjustment to Membership and Challenges of the Enlargement / EU and comparative law issues and challenges series (ECLIC) Osijek: Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2018. [Online] Dostupno na: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:118:246651 [Citirano: 02.01.2025.]

Za citiranje koristite ovu mrežnu adresu: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:118:246651
Podaci o radu
Naslov (engleski)EU Competition Law in the Digital Era: What to Tell About Intel?
AutorVlatka Butorac Malnar
AutorIvana Kunda
Autorova ustanovaSveučilište u Rijeci
Pravni fakultet
(Katedra za međunarodno pravo)
Znanstveno / umjetničko
područje, polje i grana		DRUŠTVENE ZNANOSTI
Pravo
Međunarodno privatno pravo
Sažetak (engleski)
Intel, a US-based company, was fined by the European Commission in 2009 for abusing its dominant position at the computer processor market intended to exclude its competitor AMD from that market. The penalty amounting to €1.06bn was the largest antitrust fine in the Commission’s history at the time. As the EU General Court had rejected Intel’s appeal in 2014, the matter was brought before to EU Court of Justice. The CJEU judgment, rendered in September 2017, is controversial for at least two reasons. First is the territorial reach of the EU competition law outside the EU borders, and second relates to the treatment of exclusivity rebates. With regards to the former, for the first time the CJEU confirmed the position of the Commission and the General Court regarding the extended territorial reach of the EU anti-trust legislation. Quite the opposite, the CJEU quashed the General Court ruling as to the former, arguably rejecting the traditional per se infringement of exclusivity rebates and embracing the effects-based analysis. The doctrine is somewhat divided as to whether this judgment is a much needed clarification of the two issues or it indicates a new direction in EU competition law analysis. This paper is addressing the most important ideas in the doctrinal interpretations and related arguments, and provides critical assessment of the present state of affairs. It also raises certain points relevant to the Intel judgment, which so far have not been given sufficient attention in the case comments and scholarship.
Ključne riječi (engleski)
Jezikengleski
Vrsta publikacijeZnanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Status objaveObjavljen
Vrsta recenzijeRecenziran
Verzija publikacijeObjavljena verzija rada (izdavačev PDF)
Naslov zbornikaEU Law in Context – Adjustment to Membership and Challenges of the Enlargement / EU and comparative law issues and challenges series (ECLIC)
Brojčani podacivol. 2, str. 31-62
ISBN978-953-8109-24-9
e-ISSN2459-9425
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/7098
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:118:246651
Datum objave publikacije2018
SkupNaziv: International Scientific Conference „EU Law in Context – Adjustment to Membership and Challenges of the Enlargement
Lokacija: Osijek, Hrvatska
Datum početka: 2018-06-14
Datum završetka: 2018-06-15
Vrsta izlaganja: Predavanje
URL dokumentahttp://bib.irb.hr/953068
URL dokumentahttps://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/eclic/article/view/7098
Vrsta resursaTekst
IzdavačFaculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek
Mjesto izdavanjaOsijek
Prava pristupaOtvoreni pristup
Uvjeti korištenjaIkona licence Zaštićeno autorskim pravom.
Datum i vrijeme pohrane2022-02-03 15:45:06