prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise
  Preuzmi
PDF 714.79 KB
Stručni rad - Stručni rad
Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 34 (2021), 5; 1433-1449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09751-4
Bajčić, Martina

Institucijski repozitorij: Repozitorij PravRi

Citirajte ovaj rad

Bajčić, M. (2021). Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 34. (5), 1433-1449. doi: 10.1007/s11196-020-09751-4

Bajčić, Martina. "Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise." International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, vol. 34, br. 5, 2021, str. 1433-1449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09751-4

Bajčić, Martina. "Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise." International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 34, br. 5 (2021): 1433-1449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09751-4

Bajčić, M. (2021) 'Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise', International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 34(5), str. 1433-1449. doi: 10.1007/s11196-020-09751-4

Bajčić M. Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique [Internet]. 11.2021. [pristupljeno 18.12.2024.];34(5):1433-1449. doi: 10.1007/s11196-020-09751-4

M. Bajčić, "Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise", International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, vol. 34, br. 5, str. 1433-1449, Studeni 2021. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:118:073622. [Citirano: 18.12.2024.]

Za citiranje koristite ovu mrežnu adresu: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:118:073622
Podaci o radu
Naslov (engleski)Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise
AutorMartina Bajčić
Autorova ustanovaSveučilište u Rijeci
Pravni fakultet
Znanstveno / umjetničko
područje, polje i grana		DRUŠTVENE ZNANOSTI
Pravo
Znanstveno / umjetničko
područje, polje i grana		HUMANISTIČKE ZNANOSTI
Filologija
Sažetak (engleski)
It has long been noticed that there is no predetermined meaning of legal terms. Rather, meaning depends on the context and the interpreter (Engberg in Brook J Int Law 29:1135, 2003. https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol29/iss3 /6). While this assertion holds true for both unilingual and multilingual legal environments, the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter: CJEU) openly acknowledges it, by stating that no legal consequences can be based on the terminology used. Accordingly, by virtue of the principle of equal authenticity, when interpreting EU law courts cannot rely on a single language version. Adjudicating legal disputes involving linguistic matters in a multilingual environment-i.e. cases of discrepancies between different language versions of an EU legislative text-the CJEU has been given a fascinating role insofar as its interpretative moves include linguistic comparison, which in turn bears ramifications on uniformity and equal authenticity, as well as on effectiveness of EU law. With a view to unmasking the nature of the linguistic comparison carried out by the CJEU, this study examines settled case law, asking the following questions: What are the central moves of linguistic comparison? What role does it play in the process of CJEU’s decision-making? Has it changed over time?
Ključne riječi (engleski)
Jezikengleski
Vrsta publikacijeStručni rad - Stručni rad
Status objaveObjavljen
Vrsta recenzijeRecenziran - međunarodna recenzija
Verzija publikacijeObjavljena verzija rada (izdavačev PDF)
Naslov časopisaInternational Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique
Brojčani podacivol. 34, br. 5, str. 1433-1449
p-ISSN0952-8059
e-ISSN1572-8722
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09751-4
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:118:073622
Datum objave publikacije2021-11
URL dokumentahttps://rdcu.be/dTEcG
Vrsta resursaTekst
Prava pristupaOtvoreni pristup
Uvjeti korištenjaIkona licence Zaštićeno autorskim pravom.
Datum i vrijeme pohrane2023-11-27 09:42:52