| Sažetak (hrvatski) | Razvoja radnog zakonodavstva u Republici Hrvatskoj započeo je nakon 1994., donošenjem Zakona o radu (NN, br. 38/95., 54/95., 65/95., 102/98., 17/01., 82/01., 114/03., 123/03., 142/03., 30/04. i 68/05. – dalje u tekstu: stari ZOR). Novi Zakon o radu donesen je 2009. (NN, br. 149/09., 61/11. i 82/12. - dalje u tekstu: ZOR). Stečajno zakonodavstvo je nakon stupanja na snagu 1.1.1997. mijenjano i dopunjavano kroz Stečajni zakon sedam puta (NN, br. 44/96., 29/99., 129/00., 123/03., 82/06., 116/10., 25/12. i 133/12. - dalje u tekstu: SZ), kao i donošenjem Zakona o osiguranju potraživanja radnika u slučaju stečaja poslodavca (NN, br. 86/08. - dalje u tekstu: ZOOPR) te Zakona o financijskom restrukturiranju i predstečajnoj nagodbi (NN, br. 108/12. i 144/12. - dalje u tekstu: ZFPN). Neposredan i osnovan cilj zakonodavca bio je nastaviti i održati kontinuitet razvoja radnog i stečajnog zakonodavstva. Stoga se predmetnim novelama pokušalo, u različitim opsezima, modificirati prethodno uređenje pojedinih dijelova i stečajne regulative i radnog zakonodavstva, prilagođavajući ih, potencijalno, boljim rješenjima temeljenim na iskustvu judikature i pravne teorije. Promjene koncepta trajanja ugovora o radu i uređivanje radnih odnosa u stečaju povezana je i s drugim, širim, promjenama u društvu, a prije svega s prelaskom i utjecajem neoliberalne ekonomske doktrine. Proces tranzicije i institucionalna transformacija tržišta stvorili su potrebu za novim tipom socijalne države i za radikalno izmijenjenim spektrom njenih funkcija. Odnosi komplementarnosti između tržišta i države su se, kao što se iznosi u radu, promijenili, ali nisu iščezli. U situaciji u kojoj je recesija zahvatila i hrvatsko gospodarstvo, što je za posljedicu imalo negativan utjecaj na tržište rada, sve se više susrećemo sa slučajevima otvaranja stečajnih postupaka. Stoga, pored komplementarnosti i međuzavisnosti radnog i stečajnog prava, cilj je ukazati na očigledne napetosti i trajni konfliktni potencijal te istražiti načelo socijalnog postupanja u stečajnoj regulativi. |
| Sažetak (engleski) | The development of labour law legislation in the Republic of Croatia after 1994 began with the enactment of the Labour Act (Official Gazette No. 38/95, 54/95, 65/95, 102/98, 17/01, 82/01, 114/03, 123/03, 142/03, 30/04 and 68/05), whereas the new Labour Act was enacted in 2009 (Official Gazette No. 149/09, 61/11 and 82/12). Likewise, the legislation on insolvency law following the Insolvency’s Act entry into force on 1 January 1997 was amended as much as seven times (Official Gazette No. 44/96, 29/99, 129/00, 123/03, 82/06, 116/10, 25/12 and 133/12), along with the enactment of the Act on Securing Workers’ Claims in the Case of Employer's Insolvency (Official Gazette No. 86/08) and the Act on Financial Restructuring and Pre-Bankruptcy Settlement (Official Gazette No. 108/12 and 144/12). The direct and main aim of the legislator was to keep and further the development of labour law and insolvency law. With the mentioned amendments attempts were made to modernize the previous regulation of some parts of insolvency and labour law legislation, in conformity with better solutions founded on experience of jurisdiction and legal theory. The change in the concept of duration of a contract of employment and the regulation of labour relationship in the insolvency proceedings is connected with other wider social changes and primarily with the transfer and the impact of the neoliberal economic doctrine. The process of transition and the institutional transformation of the market have created the need for a new type of social state and a radically changed spectrum of its functions. Although the intertwined complex relations between the market and the state have changed, they have not disappeared, as is made clear this paper. In a situation in which the recession impacts the Croatian economy, and consequently the labour market, we are now facing more frequently cases of new insolvency proceedings. With this in mind the authors highlight the interdependence of labour and insolvency law and illustrate tensions and their permanent conflict with the view of exploring the principle of social behaviour in insolvency legislation. |
