Objective: Lower jaw kinematics is an interesting area, both in scientific and clinical applications. Improvements of the common methods can result from application of modern technology and new achievements. The present study consisted of three different parts. The objective of the first part of the study (N=104) was to determine values of the sagittal condylar inclination, immediate side shift, Bennett angle, incisal guide angle, lateral anterior guidance angle, slide from centric occlusion to intercuspal position, and to determine variations between different groups of participants (British Standards Institution's incisal classification and Angle's classification). The purpose of the second part of the investigation was to study the reproducibility of the centric relation records between participants with disc displacement with reduction, and participants with healthy temporomandibular joints. The purpose of the third part of the study was to determine precision between two methods of bite splint fabrication: KTS system and average facebow transfer with average values of the articulator settings. Methods: All measuremets were performed using an ultrasonic device for jaw kinematics measurements and analysis with six degrees of freedom. In the second part of the study three centric relation records using the chin point guidance technique were determined for each subject, and variations between condylar positions were measured. The third part of the study involved 15 participants, who received two stabilization splints; one was made with the KTS system of the articulator settings, and the second one with an average facebow transfer and average values of the articulator settings. Precision of these two methods was tested. Results: Angle class I, II/1 and II/2 showed no difference in average values of the articulator settings with the KTS system. Angle class III group showed lower values for the sagittal condylar inclination, incisal guidance angle and lateral anterior guidance angle. The average value for the Bennett angle was 8°, consistent for all occlusion types. All the participants showed 0 mm for the immediate side shift. The obtained average value for centric occlusion to intercuspal position slide was 0.68 mm, with anteroinferior direction being the most frequent. An identical position for centric occlusion and intercuspal position was determined in less than 10% of the subjects. In the second part of the study, no statistically significant differences were determined between the two groups. The third part of the study showed no statistically significant difference in precision between the two studied methods. Conclusion: Results suggest lower values for the sagittal condylar inclination, incisal guidance angle and lateral anterior guidance angle for average articulator settings in patients with Angle class III. Differences in Bennett angle values in different occlusion types are not expected. If the immediate side shift is defined as an „immediate“ movement, it should not be expected in subjects with healthy temporomandibular joint. Results of the present study suggest that during centric relation recording in patients with disc displacement with reduction a different approach than usual cannot be recommended. Although there was no difference in precision between the two studied methods, the results suggested facebow transfer with individual articulator settings as the most precise method for the bite splint fabrication.