The aim of this research is to determine the pragmatic and hedonistic level of quality of the eVisitor information system, as well as its attractiveness. The study used a combination of two methods - an evaluation study performed using a UEQ questionnaire and a heuristic analysis in which the system was compared with Nielsen's postulates. In the heuristic analysis, it was concluded that the system is relatively well designed, apart from a few minor objections regarding graphical and terminological solutions and flexibility of use. Other features of the system have shown a very satisfactory level of compliance with Nielen's postulates: the design is easy to understand and minimalist, supporting documentation is easily accessible and clear, the system has certain functionalities that automatically prevent errors, and the user can easily and quickly see the current system status . The results of the UEQ survey show relatively neutral views of respondents about this system. Three constructs were rated negatively (attractiveness, perspicuity and stimulation) and three positively (effectiveness, dependability and novelty). The most positively rated constructs are dependability and efficiency, while the worst rated ones are perspicuity and attractiveness. Given the fact that this is primarily a utilitarian information system, and as such the imperative is ease of use and accessibility to all potential users, these results can be interpreted as generally positive