This paper explores the possibility of using multi-criteria mathematical AHP method for making decisions on the choice of advances a company sets out in its annual work plan. The established AHP model ranks the advances in order to determine the level of monitoring required. The levels of monitoring determine priorities that ensure the execution of the advances in accordance with the available resources and importance of their contribution to the community or the company. For the purposes of this research, a survey was conducted among mid-level service managers who also participate in the creation of the company’s annual work plan. The goal of the survey was to determine the criteria that are common to all the company’s services. These criteria were used in the application of multi-criteria analysis and were ranked according to the results of the survey. The proposed advances were then compared in pairs within each of the services. Conducted on a limited sample, the AHP model results were compared with ranking results of the same sample which was carried out in the company without the use of multi-criteria mathematical analysis. The results differed to a lesser extent (26%) leading to the conclusion that whilst it is not necessary for the company to change its current method of decision-making and ranking, a change would nevertheless be recommended. Multi-criteria analysis simplifies the decision-making process and makes it transparent. The proposed model provides simple sensitivity analysis results that can predict risks and make decisions for advances/projects that are the least sensitive to the implementation of possible changes.